Click any slide to jump · press m or Esc to close
A plan, a structure and a staff are three kinds of preparation. Nothing moves until someone instructs, guides, motivates and leads. Directing is the function that initiates action — and it is the only function of management performed on people rather than on work.
Chapter 4 produced a plan. Chapter 5 turned it into a structure — departments, posts, authority relationships. Chapter 6 put people into those posts, trained them and appraised them.
And still nothing has happened. A plan on paper, a chart on a wall and thirty trained employees at their desks produce no output at all. Somebody has to say start, and keep saying it in a way that people willingly follow. That is directing.
Planning, organising and staffing prepare a setting for action. Directing initiates action. Controlling then checks whether the action went where the plan said — which is Chapter 8.
Directing is one function with four elements. Three of the four are large enough to be examined on their own.
Units 6, 7 and 8 together carry 20 marks of the 80 — the largest block in the paper, and Directing is the largest chapter inside it. Motivation and Communication are the two sections the board returns to year after year, almost always as a case.
Directing refers to the process of instructing, guiding, counselling, motivating and leading people in the organisation to achieve its objectives.
Five verbs, and the examiner is scanning for them. "Directing means telling workers what to do" is worth almost nothing — it drops counselling, motivating and leading, which are the three that make directing more than order-giving.
Sanjay Kulkarni, plant head of a 400-worker auto-components unit, has a production plan, a three-shift structure and a fully staffed press shop. At 6 a.m. on Monday he walks the floor. He explains the new brake-disc tolerance to each shift in-charge, sits ten minutes with a demoralised operator whose machine failed twice last week, and announces a shift-wise output board so the best line is named at the gate.
Explaining the tolerance is instructing and guiding. Ten minutes with the demoralised operator is counselling. The output board is motivating. Walking the floor at 6 a.m. himself is leading. One three-line paragraph, four of the five verbs.
Four features. Each one is a one-line heading plus one line of explanation — that is exactly the form the answer takes.
The other four functions prepare a setting for action. Directing is where the organisation actually begins to work.
Every manager from the managing director to the shop-floor supervisor directs. Directing exists wherever a superior–subordinate relationship exists.
It runs throughout the life of the organisation. Managers change; the directing does not stop.
Directing is initiated at the top and flows down the hierarchy. Every manager directs his immediate subordinate and takes instructions from his immediate boss.
"Directing takes place at every level" and "directing flows from top to bottom" are two different features, not one. The first says who does it — everybody. The second says which way it travels — downward, one link at a time along the scalar chain. Fusing them costs a mark.
Five points. Points = marks in this subject: a 5-mark question wants five headed points, not five paragraphs and not three.
When Hooghly Jute Mills, Kolkata, moved its ledgers to a computerised accounting package in 2024, the accounts staff resisted. The manager explained the purpose, ran a two-week training batch and offered a completion allowance. Resistance fell — directing facilitated the change.
Hotel Amber Palace, Jaipur, is introducing a new digital check-in system. The front-office staff are anxious that it will cost them their jobs and are quietly refusing to use it. The general manager holds a briefing, arranges training and announces that no post will be cut. Explain, with reference to the case, any four points of importance of the directing function.
A fifth point — helping employees realise their potential — would earn nothing extra. Four marks, four points, then stop.
Eight guiding principles. Group them, then learn them — the paper usually asks for any three.
Directing techniques must help every individual contribute to his maximum potential — a good incentive plan is the usual example.
Individual goals (salary) and organisational goals (productivity) conflict. Directing must convince people the two are complementary.
A person should receive instructions from one superior only; two bosses create confusion, conflict and disorder.
Match the motivational and leadership technique to the subordinate's needs and abilities — money moves one person, promotion another.
Instructions must create total understanding, and feedback must confirm that the subordinate understood them.
Informal groups exist inside every formal structure. A manager should spot them and use them rather than fight them.
Direct through good leadership, which influences subordinates positively without causing dissatisfaction.
Giving an order is not enough. Review whether it is being implemented and modify the direction if it is not.
Harpreet Kaur leads a 12-person team building software for a Dubai client. The team missed two sprints. She holds a stand-up at which she explains the client's deadline, then sits with each developer's screen for twenty minutes to see where the code is stuck and tells them exactly which module to finish first. Output recovers within a fortnight.
A student writes: "This is motivation — she got the team to perform." Is he right? Name the element of directing that is actually being described, and say why the other reading fails.
Supervision means overseeing what is being done by subordinates and giving them instructions to ensure the optimum utilisation of resources and the achievement of work targets.
As an element of directing — supervision is performed by every manager at every level. The managing director supervises his general managers.
As a level of management — the supervisor is a managerial position at the operative level, immediately above the worker. He is the link between workers and management.
Debashis Sen is the weaving-shed supervisor over 46 loom operators. He checks the yarn tension on every loom twice a shift, shows a new operator how to re-thread a broken warp, and carries the operators' complaint about the leaking shed roof to the mill manager the same evening.
Checking the looms is supervision as an element of directing. Carrying the complaint upward is what only the supervisory level can do, because he is the only manager in daily physical contact with the workers.
"Supervision is done by the supervisory level of management, which is the lowest level." — and then lose the marks in a question about the elements of directing, where the required point is the exact opposite: that supervision is performed by every manager at every level.
| Basis | Supervision as an element of directing | Supervisor as a level of management |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | The process of overseeing subordinates' work and instructing them. | A managerial position in the hierarchy, placed immediately above the workers. |
| Who performs it | Every manager at every level, wherever a superior–subordinate relation exists. | Only the person holding that post — foreman, shift in-charge, section officer. |
| Scope | One of the four elements of directing; part of a function. | The operative / lowest level of the three levels of management. |
| Special role | Ensures optimum use of resources and achievement of targets. | Acts as the link between workers and management — no other manager touches the workers daily. |
This list is the answer to a 5- or 6-mark question. For 3 marks pick the three that fit the case in front of you — almost always link between workers and management, on-the-job training and feedback.
At Hooghly Jute Mills the loom operators refused a change in shift timings. Debashis Sen explained to them why the export order needed a night shift, and on the same day told the mill manager that the workers wanted the canteen kept open till midnight. Both sides agreed. Identify and explain the role of the supervisor being performed here, and state any two other roles.
Note the structure: the identified role first, the other two after. Reversing the order costs nothing, but omitting the identification costs the whole mark.
Motivation is the process of stimulating people to action to accomplish desired goals. It depends upon satisfying the needs of people.
Three words arrive together and are constantly swapped in answers. Keep them apart.
An inner state that energises, activates or moves and directs behaviour towards goals. Motives arise out of needs — hunger, security, affiliation, recognition.
The process of stimulating people to action by satisfying those needs.
All measures used to motivate people to improve performance — pay, bonus, promotion, recognition, responsibility.
A worker's motive is his own; motivation is what the manager does about it; the incentive is the thing the manager offers. An incentive works only when it matches the motive — a bonus does nothing for a man whose real need is respect.
The urges, drives, desires and needs that shape behaviour are internal to the individual. A manager cannot install them; he can only satisfy them.
Promotion offered to improve performance produces exactly that behaviour — if the employee wants the promotion.
Positive — a pay rise, promotion, recognition. Negative — punishment, stopping an increment, a threat. Both can produce the desired action.
Individuals differ in expectations, perceptions and reactions, so no single incentive works uniformly on all members.
Sanjay Kulkarni offered the same ₹8,000 festival bonus to every press-shop operator. Twenty-two operators raised their output; four did not move at all, and one of them told the supervisor that what he actually wanted was to be sent for the die-setting course at ARAI.
Motivation is a complex process. The same incentive produced three different responses because the underlying motives differed — and the fourth man's motive was self-development, which money does not touch.
"Reduces employee turnover" and "reduces absenteeism" are separate points. Turnover is people leaving; absenteeism is people not turning up. Merging them into "employees stay" collapses two marks into one.
Vaayu Systems, Chandigarh, lost eleven developers in one year. The new HR head introduced a quarterly "Coder of the Quarter" certificate, a flexible-hours policy and a sponsored certification programme. Attrition fell to two, and the four developers who had been on the verge of resigning stayed. Explain any four points of importance of motivation illustrated here.
Write a four-line case set in Hotel Amber Palace, Jaipur that could only be answered "motivation is a complex process" — not internal feeling, not positive or negative.
"The GM gave every housekeeping attendant the same ₹5,000 Diwali voucher. Ravi worked harder at once. Salma did not — she had asked twice to be moved to the front desk. Farhan said he would rather have Sundays off. One incentive, three reactions."
The forcing words are the same incentive and three different reactions. Without both halves the case could be read as any feature; with them it can only be complexity.
Abraham Maslow (1943) held that within every human being there exists a hierarchy of five needs: basic physiological → safety and security → affiliation/belonging → esteem → self-actualisation.
The theory rests on four assumptions, and the assumptions are examinable in their own right.
Write the five needs in the wrong order and the answer is wrong even if all five names are present. Physiological, safety and security, affiliation/belonging, esteem, self-actualisation. Never "social needs" alone — write affiliation/belonging.
The mill pays above the statutory minimum wage and runs a subsidised canteen; nobody complains about money. But after two contract weavers were let go last March, the permanent operators began refusing overtime and asked the union for a written assurance that no permanent post would be cut. A ₹3,000 productivity bonus announced in April changed nothing.
Identify the level of need in Maslow's hierarchy that is operating here, explain why the bonus failed, and name two incentives the mill should have offered instead.
Nandini Rathore, the general manager, does two things in the same week. She converts eighteen seasonal banquet staff into permanent employees with provident fund, and she creates the post of "Guest Relations Lead" with a name badge and a reserved parking slot for the best-rated attendant.
A student answers that both measures satisfy esteem needs, "because both make the staff feel valued". Correct him: name the level each measure addresses and give the test that separates the two.
Financial incentives are incentives which are in direct monetary form or measurable in monetary terms and serve to satisfy the economic needs of employees and motivate them to better performance. They may be given on an individual or a group basis.
Basic pay, dearness allowance and other allowances, with annual increments. In some firms the hike is linked to performance.
Wage plans that link payment directly to an increase in productivity, individually or by group.
An amount paid over and above the wage or salary.
Giving employees a share in the profits of the organisation, so that they work to raise those profits.
Company shares offered at a price below the market price. Share allotment creates a feeling of ownership.
Provident fund, pension and gratuity — financial security after retirement, which motivates during service.
Fringe benefits over and above salary — car allowance, housing, medical aid, children's education.
Ask who bears the risk. Bonus is paid whether or not profits rise; profit sharing is paid only out of profit; a stock option makes the employee a part-owner.
The firm's 2026 compensation letter offers each developer a monthly salary with a July increment, medical cover for the family and a school-fee reimbursement for one child, and the right to buy 400 company shares at ₹90 when the market price is ₹150.
Name the three financial incentives mentioned, quoting the words that identify each.
Non-financial incentives focus on the psychological, social and emotional needs of employees rather than on money. Money may sometimes be involved, but the emphasis is on psychological and emotional satisfaction.
The ranking of a position — the authority, responsibility, rewards, recognition, perquisites and prestige attached to it. Satisfies psychological, social and esteem needs.
The characteristics that distinguish one organisation from another and influence behaviour — individual autonomy, reward orientation, consideration to employees, risk-taking.
Skill-development programmes plus a sound promotion policy. "Promotion works as a tonic."
Designing jobs with greater variety of work content, a higher level of skill, more autonomy and responsibility, so that the job itself motivates.
Acknowledgment with a show of appreciation — congratulating, the notice board, a certificate, a memento, a reward for a valuable suggestion.
Certainty about future income and work. Its negative side: employees who cannot lose their jobs may become complacent.
Involving employees in decisions that concern them — joint management committees, work committees, canteen committees.
Giving more autonomy and power to subordinates, so that they feel their jobs are important.
(a) At Deccan Autocomp, a press operator who only loaded blanks
now sets his own die, checks the first piece and signs the quality tag
himself.
(b) At Hooghly Jute Mills the mill manager's decision on the new shift roster is
taken after a sitting of the works committee, on which four weavers sit.
(c) At Vaayu Systems a developer's name appears in the monthly
newsletter for closing the Dubai bug backlog.
(d) At Hotel Amber Palace the front-office executive may now waive a
bill of up to ₹5,000 for a dissatisfied guest without calling the GM.
(b) and (d) are the pair to be careful with: participation is being consulted; empowerment is being allowed to decide.
"Non-financial incentives are used when the company has no money to spend, because they cost nothing." — Both halves are wrong. Job enrichment needs redesigned jobs and fresh training; a recognition programme needs certificates, an event and a manager's time; career advancement needs a whole skill-development budget; a promotion almost always carries more pay.
The classification does not depend on whether money is spent. It depends on which need is being satisfied — economic, or psychological/social/emotional.
| Basis | Financial incentives | Non-financial incentives |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | Incentives in direct monetary form or measurable in monetary terms. | Incentives that focus on psychological, social and emotional satisfaction. |
| Need satisfied | Economic needs — the lower levels of Maslow's hierarchy. | Higher-level needs — affiliation, esteem, self-actualisation. |
| Cost to the firm | Always a monetary cost, and it is easy to measure. | Usually costs money too — but the cost is not what motivates. |
| Examples | Pay and allowances, bonus, profit sharing, stock option, retirement benefits, perquisites. | Status, organisational climate, career advancement, job enrichment, recognition, job security, participation, empowerment. |
Sanjay Kulkarni promotes Ravindra Jadhav, a die-setter, to Assistant Foreman. The post carries ₹6,000 more a month. Ravindra tells his wife that evening not about the money but that he will now have his own desk in the shop office, that eleven men report to him, and that he can finally take the die-change decisions he had been arguing about for six years.
The promotion carried ₹6,000 a month. Is it therefore a financial incentive? Justify your classification and name the specific incentive.
Hotel Amber Palace declares that from 2026 every permanent employee receives 2% of the year's profit, credited in April. The union says this is "job security by another name, because it makes the job worth keeping". Classify the scheme, and say what would have to change about it to make the union's description correct.
Write a four-line case set in a Chandigarh software firm that could only be answered employee empowerment — not employee participation, not job enrichment.
"Vaayu Systems used to route every client refund through the CTO. From January, a project lead may approve a refund up to ₹2 lakh on her own authority, and the CTO is only informed afterwards. Two leads used the power in the first month."
The forcing words are on her own authority and informed afterwards — power was transferred, so it cannot be participation. The job content did not change, so it cannot be job enrichment.
Leadership is the process of influencing the behaviour of people by making them strive voluntarily towards the achievement of organisational goals.
Koontz's wording — "so that they strive willingly and enthusiastically towards the achievement of group goals" — is equally acceptable. Either way the two load-bearing words are influencing and voluntarily / willingly: influence that has to be enforced is authority, not leadership.
Five features. Notice that three of them are about the followers, not about the leader.
The success of an organisation is credited to its leader, but the followers' skills, commitment, willingness to cooperate and team spirit are what make a person an effective leader. Leadership requires the existence of followers — a manager whom nobody follows is exercising authority, not leadership.
When the mill switched from a two-shift to a three-shift pattern, the weavers threatened a stoppage. The mill manager sat through a four-hour meeting letting every objection be spoken, then explained the export order line by line and worked the first night shift himself. The stoppage was called off and the shift ran.
Handles conflicts effectively — he let the followers ventilate their disagreement and then persuaded them. Introduces required changes — the new shift went in with minimum discontentment. Working the first night shift himself is leadership by example.
An autocratic leader gives orders and expects his subordinates to obey them. All authority is centralised in the leader, communication is one-way, and he relies on reward and punishment. He is dogmatic — he does not wish to be contradicted.
Where quick decisions are essential, where subordinates are unskilled or need close control, and where the manager alone is answerable for output on time — a factory floor is the standard example.
Employees take no initiative, fear expressing opinions, and work under stress. Their esteem and self-actualisation needs go unmet.
The maintenance head, Mr Deshpande, decides the annual shutdown plan alone. When a junior engineer suggested resequencing two jobs, he was told that the plan was final and that his business was to execute it. Engineers have stopped bringing suggestions; two resigned in 2025.
The board's own wording for this case is: "the problem is in the way authority is being used" — the manager is using an autocratic style, which suppresses initiative.
A democratic leader develops action plans and makes decisions in consultation with his subordinates and encourages them to participate in decision making. Communication is two-way, and he exercises control by using the forces within the group.
Nandini Rathore must cut the food-and-beverage cost by 8%. She puts the figure before the executive chef, the purchase officer and two banquet stewards, takes their three proposals, and adopts the one they collectively back — then signs the order herself. The cost falls 9% and no one complains about portion sizes.
Democratic does not mean the group decides. The leader consults, then decides. A case in which the group votes and the manager merely implements the vote is drifting towards laissez faire — and "she signs the order herself" is the phrase that keeps this one democratic.
A laissez faire or free-rein leader does not believe in the use of power unless it is absolutely essential. Followers are given a high degree of independence to formulate their own objectives and the ways to achieve them; the manager only supports them and supplies the required information, while the subordinate assumes responsibility for the work.
The four-person research cell was told to "find something worth patenting by March". They chose the problem, fixed their own milestones and picked the toolchain; the CTO's only interventions were to buy two GPU servers and to answer questions when asked. One patent application was filed in February 2026.
Even a laissez faire leader lays down certain rules to be followed, and a democratic leader may have to decide alone in an emergency. A leader chooses a combination of styles according to the situation — write that line whenever a question asks which style is "best".
| Basis | Autocratic | Democratic | Laissez faire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authority | Fully centralised in the leader. | Shared — decisions taken in consultation. | Given to the group; the leader keeps almost none. |
| Communication | One-way, downward only. | Two-way, upward and downward. | Mostly lateral, within the group. |
| Decision making | The leader decides alone. | The leader decides after consulting. | The subordinates decide and assume responsibility. |
| Suitability | Unskilled staff, emergencies, quick decisions. | Experienced and competent subordinates. | Highly qualified, self-motivated professionals. |
Harpreet Kaur normally lets her team pick its own sprint tasks and rarely intervenes. On 18 March the client's production server went down at 11 p.m. She told three named developers exactly which log to open, forbade any other work until the fix shipped, and refused to discuss the rota until the outage was closed. By morning it was fixed. On Monday she was back to the old way.
A student writes: "Harpreet is an autocratic leader." Another writes: "She is a laissez faire leader who made a mistake." Both are wrong. Say what is actually being illustrated, and name the two styles in the order they appear.
"Motivation and leadership are the same thing, because both make people work." — They are two separate elements of directing, and a case question will punish the fusion. Motivating is one of the things a leader does; it is not the whole of leadership, and a person with no followers can still be motivated.
| Basis | Motivation | Leadership |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | The process of stimulating people to action by satisfying their needs. | The process of influencing behaviour so that people strive willingly towards group goals. |
| Basis of influence | The need of the individual — pay, security, recognition, growth. | The personal influence of the leader and his relationship with followers. |
| Requires | An incentive matched to a motive. No followers are needed. | Followers. Without them there is no leadership. |
| Relationship | A tool the leader uses. | The wider activity that uses motivation, supervision and communication together. |
"Sanjay Kulkarni raised the night-shift allowance from ₹200 to ₹350 and the number of volunteers doubled." — Motivation: a need was satisfied by an incentive, and no personal influence was exercised. Change it to "Sanjay worked the night shift himself for a week and the volunteers doubled" and it becomes leadership.
Communication is the process of exchange of ideas, views, facts and feelings between or among people to create a common understanding.
The word comes from the Latin communis — "common". The whole point of the definition is the phrase common understanding: a message that was sent but not understood is not communication. Write ideas, views, facts and feelings, not just "information" — communication is not only the transfer of data.
A manager is estimated to spend about 90% of his time communicating — reading, writing, listening, guiding, instructing. The figure is illustrative, not examinable; the point it makes is not.
The person who conveys his thoughts or ideas to the receiver — the source of the communication.
The content of the idea, feeling, suggestion or order intended to be communicated.
Converting the message into communication symbols — words, pictures, gestures.
The path through which the encoded message is transmitted — written, face to face, a phone call, e-mail.
Converting the encoded symbols back into meaning by the receiver.
The person who receives the communication of the sender.
Any obstruction or hindrance to communication — a bad phone line, an inattentive receiver, an ambiguous symbol, faulty decoding, a prejudice, a distorting gesture.
All those actions of the receiver indicating that he has received and understood the sender's message.
If the question says "state the elements of the communication process", write all eight. Noise and feedback are elements, not extras — and they are the two that a three-mark case is almost always built on.
Noise is any obstruction or hindrance to communication, and it may be caused to the sender, the message or the receiver: an ambiguous symbol that leads to faulty encoding, a poor telephone connection, an inattentive receiver, faulty decoding, a prejudice, or a gesture that contradicts the words.
Feedback is all those actions of the receiver indicating that he has received and understood the message. Until it arrives, the sender has transmitted, not communicated. That is why the definition ends in "to reach a common understanding" — and why every measure for overcoming barriers ends with "ensure proper feedback".
Nandini Rathore telephoned the banquet manager from the airport and said, "Take care of the Sharma party." She meant transport, rooms and dinner until the family left Jaipur; he understood it as "escort them to their rooms", and the family waited ninety minutes for a car. The line was also breaking up.
Identify the element of the communication process that broke down, name the kind of noise involved, and state the one measure that would have prevented it.
Formal communication flows through the official channels designed in the organisation chart. It may be oral or written, but is generally recorded and filed in the office.
Superior to subordinate. Examples: a notice to attend a meeting, an order to complete an assigned work, top management's guidelines passed down.
Subordinate to superior. Examples: an application for leave, a progress report, a request for a grant.
Between employees of the same cadre or between divisions — the production manager calling the marketing manager about a delivery schedule.
On 4 May the plant head circulated a signed notice putting the shutdown on 18 May (downward). The press-shop supervisor filed a written requisition for two spare dies (upward). The quality manager rang the production manager, his equal in rank, to agree the inspection sequence for the shutdown week (horizontal).
Communication that takes place without following the formal lines of communication is informal communication. It is called the grapevine because it spreads throughout the organisation with its branches going out in all directions in utter disregard of the levels of authority.
It arises out of the employees' need to exchange views that cannot be exchanged through formal channels — workers in the canteen discussing a superior's behaviour, or a rumour about transfers.
It spreads rapidly, it gets distorted, its source is hard to detect, and it generates rumours that can damage the work environment.
An intelligent manager does not try to abolish the grapevine — it cannot be abolished. He makes use of its positive aspects and minimises the negative ones: he uses informal channels to release information and to sense his subordinates' reactions.
Three days before any circular was issued, the whole weaving shed already "knew" that the mill would go on a four-day week — the story had travelled from a clerk in the accounts room to the canteen and back. Two operators resigned on the strength of it. The circular, when it came, announced no such thing.
"Informal communication is communication between friends, so it happens outside office hours." — No. The grapevine runs inside the organisation, during working hours, about organisational matters. What makes it informal is that it does not follow the official channels of the organisation chart — nothing to do with friendship or the clock.
| Basis | Formal communication | Informal communication (grapevine) |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | Flows through the official channels designed in the organisation chart. | Flows without following the formal lines, out of social relationships. |
| Authority levels | Follows the scalar chain — upward, downward or horizontal. | Disregards the levels of authority entirely; a clerk may tell a general manager. |
| Record | Generally recorded and filed in the office; evidence exists. | Not recorded; the source is difficult even to detect. |
| Speed and reliability | Slower — but authentic and reliable. | Very fast — but liable to distortion and rumour. |
In the Mohali office everybody approaches anybody for every small query. Nothing is put in writing, work is interrupted all day, and a client's unreleased pricing sheet reached a competitor through a lunch-table conversation.
What system should the manager adopt, and why? Name the network of formal communication that fits an office where a superior must control who talks to whom, and say what he should not attempt.
Semantic barriers are problems and obstructions in the process of encoding and decoding a message into words or impressions. They arise from the use of wrong words, faulty translations and different interpretations.
The design head e-mailed the press shop: "Hold the runout within 40 microns TIR on the pilot batch." The shop in-charge, a diploma holder with twenty years on the machines, did not know what TIR meant and did not ask. The batch was measured on the wrong axis.
Psychological or emotional barriers arise from the state of mind of the sender and the receiver. A worried person cannot communicate properly and an angry receiver cannot grasp the real meaning of the message.
The housekeeping supervisor began explaining a new linen-tracking sheet to the GM. Two lines in, the GM said "I know, I know — this is the same idea that failed in 2023", and moved to the next agenda item while opening a bill file. The sheet was in fact a different design, and it was never adopted.
Premature evaluation — he judged before the sender finished. Lack of attention — the pre-occupied mind, opening a bill file. Both are psychological.
Organisational barriers arise from the organisation structure, authority relationships, rules and regulations.
A tester found a payment bug an hour before a release. The firm's rule is that all defects travel by written ticket through the team lead, then the project manager, then the delivery head. He was not permitted to telephone the delivery head directly, the ticket cleared three queues in six hours, and the build shipped with the bug in it.
Rules and regulations — insisting on the prescribed channel causes delay, and three levels of routing is also complexity in the organisation structure. It is not a personal barrier: the tester was willing to speak and the delivery head willing to listen. The system stopped them, and it would have stopped anyone.
Status is an organisational barrier when it is the rank difference that silences the subordinate. It is a non-financial incentive when it is the ranking of a post being offered as a reward. Same word, two roles — read the case, not the word.
Personal barriers arise from the personal factors of the sender and the receiver — that is, of the superior and of the subordinate.
A weaver worked out that re-sequencing the batching feed would save two hours a shift. He said nothing, because when a colleague made a suggestion in 2024 it was adopted, the department in-charge took the credit, and the colleague got not even a mention on the notice board.
Lack of proper incentives — a personal barrier on the subordinate's side. Note it is not an organisational barrier: no rule, policy or level stopped him. His own calculation of what speaking was worth did.
Classify each of these into one of the four families, and name the specific barrier inside it.
Notice how close (a) and (b) look. The test is the one from the diagram: (a) is the system — anyone's leave request would be delayed. (b) is the person — another in-charge would have passed it up.
Study and analyse the problem in depth so that it is clear to the sender first.
Adjust to the receiver's education and level of understanding.
Involve others in developing the plan for communication — it buys ready acceptance.
The language must be understandable and must not offend the sentiments of the listener.
Know the receiver's interests and needs — a message that touches them evokes a response.
Ask questions about the message conveyed and encourage the receiver to respond.
Meet existing commitments, but aim also at the future goals of the enterprise.
Review regularly whether the instruction is being implemented, and remove the hurdles.
Patient and attentive listening solves half the problems — and shows the subordinate that listening is happening.
"What are the common barriers to effective communication? Suggest measures to overcome
them."
Six marks means six points — so plan the split before you write.
The plant has seven levels between the managing director and an operator. A safety instruction issued on 2 June reached the shop floor on 11 June, by which time "wear the cut-resistant gloves at the trimming station" had become "gloves are compulsory in the plant", and operators were wearing them on the press, where a glove is dangerous.
A student answers "semantic barrier — the message was badly expressed". Is he right? Identify the barriers actually at work, and give the two measures that address this case specifically.
Write a four-line case set in a Jaipur hotel that could only be answered personal barrier — lack of confidence of the superior in his subordinates — not distrust, not status.
"The GM is drawing up the new banquet tariff. The front-office manager has costed banquets for eleven years, but the GM does not ask him — she says the desk staff 'would not understand margins'. She costs it alone, and misprices the wedding season."
The forcing words are does not ask and would not understand: the superior believes the subordinate is not competent, so he never seeks his advice. Distrust would need mutual disbelief; status would need the rank, not the ability, to be the reason.
If you cannot define a chip, go back to its slide before the exam practice.
As an element it is done by every manager at every level. As a level it is the post immediately above the worker. Read which the question wants.
It usually costs a great deal. Classify by the need satisfied — economic, or psychological / social / emotional.
Motivation satisfies a need; leadership exerts personal influence. Motivating is one of the things a leader does.
The democratic leader consults, then decides. If the group decides, the style has slid into laissez faire.
Four questions, in order: was it the word, the state of mind, the system, or the person?
Points = marks. Headed points, never paragraphs. "Distinguish" is a table with a named basis column. Quote the line from the case that proves it.
A one-mark answer is one line — the name, or the definition, and nothing else. Writing a paragraph for one mark loses time, not marks.
The workers of a Kolkata jute mill always show their inability when new work is given to them and are unwilling to take up any kind of work. Because of a sudden rise in export demand the mill must meet excess orders, and the supervisor is finding it difficult to cope. State the element of directing that can help the supervisor, and explain any two of its features.
"Supervision" is the tempting wrong answer. The supervisor is already supervising; what is missing is willingness, and willingness is motivation's business.
A Chandigarh software firm provides free medical aid to its employees' families and free education for their children, runs a "Best Debugger" certificate every quarter, and lets each team lead approve refunds up to ₹2 lakh without reference upward. Identify the three incentives being highlighted, state the category of each, and name one more incentive from the category that appears twice.
"Discuss Maslow's Need Hierarchy theory of motivation." — Six marks, so six points. Plan them before you write.
Draw the pyramid in the margin — it costs twenty seconds and it stops you writing the five in the wrong order.
Output in the spinning department has fallen for three quarters. Debashis Sen reports that wages are above the industry rate and the canteen is subsidised, but the operators say the department in-charge decides the loom allocation alone, never explains it, and told a senior operator last month that "your job is to spin, not to ask". Two of the four best operators have applied to a competing mill. Management's response so far has been a ₹2,000 attendance bonus, which changed nothing.
(a) Identify the leadership style in use and its effect. (b) Explain, using Maslow, why the ₹2,000 bonus failed. (c) Recommend two non-financial incentives, naming each in the exam's words.
Nandini Rathore circulates a signed note on 1 April: the banquet hall will close for renovation from 1 June. By 3 April the housekeeping floor "knows" that the hotel is being sold and that jobs will go — the story travelled from the linen room to the staff canteen, and each teller added a little. Six attendants apply elsewhere. On 8 April Nandini calls a full staff meeting, reads the note aloud, invites questions for an hour, and asks the union secretary to repeat back what the plan is.
(a) Name the two types of communication at work and identify which grapevine network the rumour followed. (b) Which need level did the rumour threaten? (c) Name three measures Nandini used on 8 April.
A German customer audit is due in nine days. Sanjay Kulkarni calls the four department heads, puts the audit checklist on the table and asks each to propose his own corrective plan; he adopts three of the four proposals and rewrites the fourth himself. He then tells the press-shop head that for the next nine days the shop will run exactly as he directs, with no deviation, because a single scrapped batch will fail the audit. He also announces that the four departments will jointly be given a day's outing if the audit is cleared.
Identify the two leadership styles used, say which situation justified each, name the element of directing behind the day's outing, and classify that incentive.
Once people are working, a manager needs to know whether the work is going where the plan said. Chapter 8 closes the loop back to Chapter 4.
What Chapter 8 will need from this one: the idea of feedback from the communication process — controlling is the whole organisation's feedback loop; the supervisor, who measures actual performance at the operative level; and motivation, because corrective action taken without it produces compliance and nothing more.